Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
AAR ruled that the applicant cannot claim Input Tax Credit (ITC) for IGST on imported warranty parts where the foreign supplier (M/s. MUEGGE GmbH) paid the tax. Despite importing parts in the applicant's name for warranty services, the ITC cannot be availed since the tax was discharged by the foreign supplier, and the invoice for warranty service did not include spare parts cost. The ruling interprets section 16 of CGST Act, 2017, denying ITC eligibility based on the specific transactional arrangement between the parties.
AAR ruled that the applicant cannot claim Input Tax Credit (ITC) for IGST on imported warranty parts where the foreign supplier (M/s. MUEGGE GmbH) paid the tax. Despite importing parts in the applicant's name for warranty services, the ITC cannot be availed since the tax was discharged by the foreign supplier, and the invoice for warranty service did not include spare parts cost. The ruling interprets section 16 of CGST Act, 2017, denying ITC eligibility based on the specific transactional arrangement between the parties.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
