Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
CESTAT adjudicated a smuggling case involving gold and currency. The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, holding that certain gold ornaments and one gold bar were not liable for confiscation due to discharged burden of proof under Section 123 of Customs Act. However, 26 gold biscuits were confiscated for lack of legitimate purchase documentation. The seized Indian currency of Rs.1,88,00,800 was ordered to be released. Penalties against two individuals were reduced to Rs.5,00,000 and Rs.2,00,000, while the penalty against the third individual was completely set aside. The appeals were disposed of with these specific directions.
CESTAT adjudicated a smuggling case involving gold and currency. The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, holding that certain gold ornaments and one gold bar were not liable for confiscation due to discharged burden of proof under Section 123 of Customs Act. However, 26 gold biscuits were confiscated for lack of legitimate purchase documentation. The seized Indian currency of Rs.1,88,00,800 was ordered to be released. Penalties against two individuals were reduced to Rs.5,00,000 and Rs.2,00,000, while the penalty against the third individual was completely set aside. The appeals were disposed of with these specific directions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.