Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
HC held that the Commissioner (Appeals) order dated 25.03.2009 granting refund was final and binding, precluding subsequent challenges by the department. The department's attempt to re-litigate the refund claim through another Commissioner (Appeals) was deemed procedurally improper and an exercise in futility. The court emphasized judicial discipline, ruling that orders by coordinate authorities achieving finality are binding on successors. The impugned order was quashed, and the original refund order was restored, effectively upholding the petitioner's refund claim based on total duty paid across product categories.
HC held that the Commissioner (Appeals) order dated 25.03.2009 granting refund was final and binding, precluding subsequent challenges by the department. The department's attempt to re-litigate the refund claim through another Commissioner (Appeals) was deemed procedurally improper and an exercise in futility. The court emphasized judicial discipline, ruling that orders by coordinate authorities achieving finality are binding on successors. The impugned order was quashed, and the original refund order was restored, effectively upholding the petitioner's refund claim based on total duty paid across product categories.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
