Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT held that non-woven fabrics composed of polyolefin fibers are classifiable under CETH 5603 as non-woven fabrics of man-made filaments. The tribunal found no substantive evidence from the Revenue to support classification under CETH 39021000. Laboratory reports from the Textile Committee and Customs House confirmed the product's composition as polypropylene fiber-based non-woven fabric. The Revenue failed to provide corroborative test reports or specific sub-classification details for Chapter 39. Consequently, the adjudicating authority's original order was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed, maintaining classification under Chapter 56.
CESTAT held that non-woven fabrics composed of polyolefin fibers are classifiable under CETH 5603 as non-woven fabrics of man-made filaments. The tribunal found no substantive evidence from the Revenue to support classification under CETH 39021000. Laboratory reports from the Textile Committee and Customs House confirmed the product's composition as polypropylene fiber-based non-woven fabric. The Revenue failed to provide corroborative test reports or specific sub-classification details for Chapter 39. Consequently, the adjudicating authority's original order was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed, maintaining classification under Chapter 56.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.