Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
SC held that a personal guarantor remains liable for cheque dishonour even after company liquidation. Despite moratorium under IBC, criminal proceedings under Section 138 of N.I. Act can continue. The appellant was granted a final opportunity to deposit 25% of cheque amount within eight weeks, failing which legal consequences including potential custody would ensue. The appeals were dismissed, with directions for the High Court to hear the revisional application on merits if deposit is made, allowing reasonable opportunity for all parties to present their versions.
SC held that a personal guarantor remains liable for cheque dishonour even after company liquidation. Despite moratorium under IBC, criminal proceedings under Section 138 of N.I. Act can continue. The appellant was granted a final opportunity to deposit 25% of cheque amount within eight weeks, failing which legal consequences including potential custody would ensue. The appeals were dismissed, with directions for the High Court to hear the revisional application on merits if deposit is made, allowing reasonable opportunity for all parties to present their versions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.