Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
HC ruled that the possession of immovable and movable assets was taken contrary to legal mandates under Section 14(1-A) of SARFAESI Act. The Additional District Magistrate improperly delegated possession authority, violating constitutional rights under Article 300A. The Additional Commissioner of Police was not authorized to further delegate possession powers, and the officers who took possession were not legally empowered. The court allowed the writ petition, directing the respondent to retake possession strictly in compliance with statutory provisions, ensuring proper notice to guarantors and adherence to procedural requirements. The judgment emphasizes the importance of following legal protocols in asset seizure proceedings.
HC ruled that the possession of immovable and movable assets was taken contrary to legal mandates under Section 14(1-A) of SARFAESI Act. The Additional District Magistrate improperly delegated possession authority, violating constitutional rights under Article 300A. The Additional Commissioner of Police was not authorized to further delegate possession powers, and the officers who took possession were not legally empowered. The court allowed the writ petition, directing the respondent to retake possession strictly in compliance with statutory provisions, ensuring proper notice to guarantors and adherence to procedural requirements. The judgment emphasizes the importance of following legal protocols in asset seizure proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.