Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
HC allows criminal petition, acquitting accused of NI Act Section 138 offense. The court found procedural irregularities in prosecution, specifically noting the failure to implead the Society as a party, which prevented vicarious liability. Consequently, the lower court's judgment sentencing the accused to six months imprisonment and Rs. 1.50 lacs compensation was set aside. The accused was directed to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with a surety, effective for six months, with provisions for potential Supreme Court appearances. Fine amount, if deposited, shall be refunded after statutory limitation period.
HC allows criminal petition, acquitting accused of NI Act Section 138 offense. The court found procedural irregularities in prosecution, specifically noting the failure to implead the Society as a party, which prevented vicarious liability. Consequently, the lower court's judgment sentencing the accused to six months imprisonment and Rs. 1.50 lacs compensation was set aside. The accused was directed to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with a surety, effective for six months, with provisions for potential Supreme Court appearances. Fine amount, if deposited, shall be refunded after statutory limitation period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.