Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that for reassessment proceedings under Section 153C, the relevant date is when the Assessing Officer decides to initiate re-assessment, not the search date. The ten-year block is calculated from the end of AY 2024-25, when the notice was issued on 30.03.2024. Consistent with prior judicial precedents, the court found the impugned notice barred by limitation and allowed the petition, setting aside the notice as time-barred.
HC held that for reassessment proceedings under Section 153C, the relevant date is when the Assessing Officer decides to initiate re-assessment, not the search date. The ten-year block is calculated from the end of AY 2024-25, when the notice was issued on 30.03.2024. Consistent with prior judicial precedents, the court found the impugned notice barred by limitation and allowed the petition, setting aside the notice as time-barred.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.