Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remanding the case to the AO to verify whether the assessee claimed asset acquisition costs as "application of income" in current or prior years. The Tribunal held that depreciation disallowance under Section 11(6) is permissible only if asset acquisition costs were previously claimed as income application. Based on the assessee's Chartered Accountant certificate and record verification, the Tribunal directed the AO to conduct a comprehensive review and provide relief if no prior income application claim is found, ensuring procedural fairness and compliance with statutory provisions.
ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remanding the case to the AO to verify whether the assessee claimed asset acquisition costs as "application of income" in current or prior years. The Tribunal held that depreciation disallowance under Section 11(6) is permissible only if asset acquisition costs were previously claimed as income application. Based on the assessee's Chartered Accountant certificate and record verification, the Tribunal directed the AO to conduct a comprehensive review and provide relief if no prior income application claim is found, ensuring procedural fairness and compliance with statutory provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.