Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
HC determined the jurisdictional authority of SGST to initiate and adjudicate tax proceedings. The court held that under Section 6(2)(b) of CGST Act, the DGST Department must reconsider the prior appellate order and reassess the show cause notice and subsequent impugned order. The impugned order was set aside, with instructions to place the Commissioner's (Appeals-I) order before DGST for fresh consideration and comprehensive review of the underlying tax matter.
HC determined the jurisdictional authority of SGST to initiate and adjudicate tax proceedings. The court held that under Section 6(2)(b) of CGST Act, the DGST Department must reconsider the prior appellate order and reassess the show cause notice and subsequent impugned order. The impugned order was set aside, with instructions to place the Commissioner's (Appeals-I) order before DGST for fresh consideration and comprehensive review of the underlying tax matter.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
