Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC determined the invalidity of a Section 148 notice challenging the Assessing Officer's (AO) assumption regarding material advances and closing stock discrepancies. The court found that the AO erroneously interpreted material advances as an indication of understated closing stock, despite the advance being already accounted for in the revenue bill. The AO lacked jurisdiction to reopen the assessment based on information already examined during the original assessment. Consequently, the HC quashed the reassessment notice, ruling in favor of the assessee and determining that the purported stock variation could not substantiate claims of escaped income.
HC determined the invalidity of a Section 148 notice challenging the Assessing Officer's (AO) assumption regarding material advances and closing stock discrepancies. The court found that the AO erroneously interpreted material advances as an indication of understated closing stock, despite the advance being already accounted for in the revenue bill. The AO lacked jurisdiction to reopen the assessment based on information already examined during the original assessment. Consequently, the HC quashed the reassessment notice, ruling in favor of the assessee and determining that the purported stock variation could not substantiate claims of escaped income.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
