Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
HC ruling on tax reassessment for AY 2014-2015: The court held that the reassessment notice under Section 148 was invalid. The AO's reopening of assessment was deemed a mere change of opinion rather than discovery of new material, as the original assessment was based on search operation materials. The court found that the materials used for reopening were already part of the original assessment proceedings. Consequently, the court set aside the reassessment notice dated 31.03.2021 and the order rejecting objections dated 21.02.2022, effectively allowing the writ petition and invalidating the reassessment proceedings.
HC ruling on tax reassessment for AY 2014-2015: The court held that the reassessment notice under Section 148 was invalid. The AO's reopening of assessment was deemed a mere change of opinion rather than discovery of new material, as the original assessment was based on search operation materials. The court found that the materials used for reopening were already part of the original assessment proceedings. Consequently, the court set aside the reassessment notice dated 31.03.2021 and the order rejecting objections dated 21.02.2022, effectively allowing the writ petition and invalidating the reassessment proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.