Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC ruling on tax reassessment for AY 2014-2015: The court held that the reassessment notice under Section 148 was invalid. The AO's reopening of assessment was deemed a mere change of opinion rather than discovery of new material, as the original assessment was based on search operation materials. The court found that the materials used for reopening were already part of the original assessment proceedings. Consequently, the court set aside the reassessment notice dated 31.03.2021 and the order rejecting objections dated 21.02.2022, effectively allowing the writ petition and invalidating the reassessment proceedings.
HC ruling on tax reassessment for AY 2014-2015: The court held that the reassessment notice under Section 148 was invalid. The AO's reopening of assessment was deemed a mere change of opinion rather than discovery of new material, as the original assessment was based on search operation materials. The court found that the materials used for reopening were already part of the original assessment proceedings. Consequently, the court set aside the reassessment notice dated 31.03.2021 and the order rejecting objections dated 21.02.2022, effectively allowing the writ petition and invalidating the reassessment proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.