Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision, allowing normal deduction u/s 35(1)(iv) for R&D capital expenditure disallowed under weighted deduction u/s 35(2AB). The tribunal found the issue consistent with the assessee's previous year's case, affirming that capital expenditure on scientific research at an approved R&D facility remains deductible even if not qualifying for enhanced deduction. Revenue's appeal grounds were comprehensively dismissed, maintaining the lower appellate authority's reasoning and providing tax relief to the assessee.
ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision, allowing normal deduction u/s 35(1)(iv) for R&D capital expenditure disallowed under weighted deduction u/s 35(2AB). The tribunal found the issue consistent with the assessee's previous year's case, affirming that capital expenditure on scientific research at an approved R&D facility remains deductible even if not qualifying for enhanced deduction. Revenue's appeal grounds were comprehensively dismissed, maintaining the lower appellate authority's reasoning and providing tax relief to the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
