Habeas corpus challenge to arrest safeguards remains maintainable, but substantial compliance with reasons-to-believe requirement defeats the petition...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3321 to 3340 of 96332 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision, allowing normal deduction u/s 35(1)(iv) for R&D capital expenditure disallowed under weighted deduction u/s 35(2AB). The tribunal found the issue consistent with the assessee's previous year's case, affirming that capital expenditure on scientific research at an approved R&D facility remains deductible even if not qualifying for enhanced deduction. Revenue's appeal grounds were comprehensively dismissed, maintaining the lower appellate authority's reasoning and providing tax relief to the assessee.
ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision, allowing normal deduction u/s 35(1)(iv) for R&D capital expenditure disallowed under weighted deduction u/s 35(2AB). The tribunal found the issue consistent with the assessee's previous year's case, affirming that capital expenditure on scientific research at an approved R&D facility remains deductible even if not qualifying for enhanced deduction. Revenue's appeal grounds were comprehensively dismissed, maintaining the lower appellate authority's reasoning and providing tax relief to the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
