Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision, allowing normal deduction u/s 35(1)(iv) for R&D capital expenditure disallowed under weighted deduction u/s 35(2AB). The tribunal found the issue consistent with the assessee's previous year's case, affirming that capital expenditure on scientific research at an approved R&D facility remains deductible even if not qualifying for enhanced deduction. Revenue's appeal grounds were comprehensively dismissed, maintaining the lower appellate authority's reasoning and providing tax relief to the assessee.
ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision, allowing normal deduction u/s 35(1)(iv) for R&D capital expenditure disallowed under weighted deduction u/s 35(2AB). The tribunal found the issue consistent with the assessee's previous year's case, affirming that capital expenditure on scientific research at an approved R&D facility remains deductible even if not qualifying for enhanced deduction. Revenue's appeal grounds were comprehensively dismissed, maintaining the lower appellate authority's reasoning and providing tax relief to the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
