Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
NCLAT dismissed the appeal, affirming the financial debt of Rs. 2.5 Crores against the corporate debtor. The tribunal held that the default was established through audited financial statements dated 31.01.2019, which predates the Section 10A exemption period. The information utility record and financial statements conclusively proved the debt, and the liquidator was legally authorized to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) proceedings. The court rejected appellant's contentions regarding lack of written documentation and challenged the liquidator's right to pursue legal recovery, ultimately upholding the financial creditor's claim.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal, affirming the financial debt of Rs. 2.5 Crores against the corporate debtor. The tribunal held that the default was established through audited financial statements dated 31.01.2019, which predates the Section 10A exemption period. The information utility record and financial statements conclusively proved the debt, and the liquidator was legally authorized to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) proceedings. The court rejected appellant's contentions regarding lack of written documentation and challenged the liquidator's right to pursue legal recovery, ultimately upholding the financial creditor's claim.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.