Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4401 to 4420 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT dismissed the appeal, affirming the financial debt of Rs. 2.5 Crores against the corporate debtor. The tribunal held that the default was established through audited financial statements dated 31.01.2019, which predates the Section 10A exemption period. The information utility record and financial statements conclusively proved the debt, and the liquidator was legally authorized to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) proceedings. The court rejected appellant's contentions regarding lack of written documentation and challenged the liquidator's right to pursue legal recovery, ultimately upholding the financial creditor's claim.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal, affirming the financial debt of Rs. 2.5 Crores against the corporate debtor. The tribunal held that the default was established through audited financial statements dated 31.01.2019, which predates the Section 10A exemption period. The information utility record and financial statements conclusively proved the debt, and the liquidator was legally authorized to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) proceedings. The court rejected appellant's contentions regarding lack of written documentation and challenged the liquidator's right to pursue legal recovery, ultimately upholding the financial creditor's claim.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
