Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
281 to 300 of 95714 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT adjudicated two key tax matters involving a taxpayer's ULIP policy and residential property capital gains. The tribunal held that the LIC Market Plus-1 Policy constitutes a capital asset, rendering gains from its surrender taxable under "Capital Gains" rather than "Income from Other Sources". Additionally, the tribunal ruled that capital gains from multiple residential property sales can be invested in a single residential property, allowing the taxpayer's exemption claim under section 54. The tribunal found the assessee complied with statutory requirements by constructing a new house within three years and depositing capital gains in a prescribed scheme account. Consequently, the tribunal allowed the assessee's appeals, directing the Assessing Officer to grant the claimed section 54 exemption and recognize the capital gains treatment for the ULIP policy surrender.
ITAT adjudicated two key tax matters involving a taxpayer's ULIP policy and residential property capital gains. The tribunal held that the LIC Market Plus-1 Policy constitutes a capital asset, rendering gains from its surrender taxable under "Capital Gains" rather than "Income from Other Sources". Additionally, the tribunal ruled that capital gains from multiple residential property sales can be invested in a single residential property, allowing the taxpayer's exemption claim under section 54. The tribunal found the assessee complied with statutory requirements by constructing a new house within three years and depositing capital gains in a prescribed scheme account. Consequently, the tribunal allowed the assessee's appeals, directing the Assessing Officer to grant the claimed section 54 exemption and recognize the capital gains treatment for the ULIP policy surrender.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.