Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging the appointment of a Resolution Professional (RP) under Section 95 and Section 97 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Tribunal held that personal guarantors lack standing to challenge RP appointment as a procedural step, and their rights are safeguarded by the ability to file objections against the RP's report. The proceedings from Sections 95 to 100 do not have adjudicatory effect, and the appointment process remains exclusively within the Adjudicating Authority's discretion. The appeal was deemed non-tenable, with the original RP appointment order being upheld as statutorily compliant.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging the appointment of a Resolution Professional (RP) under Section 95 and Section 97 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Tribunal held that personal guarantors lack standing to challenge RP appointment as a procedural step, and their rights are safeguarded by the ability to file objections against the RP's report. The proceedings from Sections 95 to 100 do not have adjudicatory effect, and the appointment process remains exclusively within the Adjudicating Authority's discretion. The appeal was deemed non-tenable, with the original RP appointment order being upheld as statutorily compliant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
