Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging the appointment of a Resolution Professional (RP) under Section 95 and Section 97 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Tribunal held that personal guarantors lack standing to challenge RP appointment as a procedural step, and their rights are safeguarded by the ability to file objections against the RP's report. The proceedings from Sections 95 to 100 do not have adjudicatory effect, and the appointment process remains exclusively within the Adjudicating Authority's discretion. The appeal was deemed non-tenable, with the original RP appointment order being upheld as statutorily compliant.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging the appointment of a Resolution Professional (RP) under Section 95 and Section 97 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Tribunal held that personal guarantors lack standing to challenge RP appointment as a procedural step, and their rights are safeguarded by the ability to file objections against the RP's report. The proceedings from Sections 95 to 100 do not have adjudicatory effect, and the appointment process remains exclusively within the Adjudicating Authority's discretion. The appeal was deemed non-tenable, with the original RP appointment order being upheld as statutorily compliant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
