Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging the appointment of a Resolution Professional (RP) under Section 95 and Section 97 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Tribunal held that personal guarantors lack standing to challenge RP appointment as a procedural step, and their rights are safeguarded by the ability to file objections against the RP's report. The proceedings from Sections 95 to 100 do not have adjudicatory effect, and the appointment process remains exclusively within the Adjudicating Authority's discretion. The appeal was deemed non-tenable, with the original RP appointment order being upheld as statutorily compliant.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging the appointment of a Resolution Professional (RP) under Section 95 and Section 97 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Tribunal held that personal guarantors lack standing to challenge RP appointment as a procedural step, and their rights are safeguarded by the ability to file objections against the RP's report. The proceedings from Sections 95 to 100 do not have adjudicatory effect, and the appointment process remains exclusively within the Adjudicating Authority's discretion. The appeal was deemed non-tenable, with the original RP appointment order being upheld as statutorily compliant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
