Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
Public servant status under anti-corruption law extends to recognised stock exchange leadership; constitutional and sanction challenges do not succeed...
Acquiescence, homebuyer protection and clean-slate resolution principles prevent landowners from disrupting an integrated project through late termina...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1001 to 1020 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC allowed the petition challenging the rejection of an application under Vera Samadhan Yojna, 2019. The court found the respondent's literal interpretation of the Amnesty Scheme inappropriate, particularly given the lack of prior intimation about interest shortfall. The HC quashed the order rejecting the application, directed restoration of the Amnesty Scheme benefits to the petitioner, and ordered refund of Rs. 4,78,833/- recovered from the petitioner's bank account, with 9% per annum interest from the date of recovery until repayment.
HC allowed the petition challenging the rejection of an application under Vera Samadhan Yojna, 2019. The court found the respondent's literal interpretation of the Amnesty Scheme inappropriate, particularly given the lack of prior intimation about interest shortfall. The HC quashed the order rejecting the application, directed restoration of the Amnesty Scheme benefits to the petitioner, and ordered refund of Rs. 4,78,833/- recovered from the petitioner's bank account, with 9% per annum interest from the date of recovery until repayment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.