Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
HC allowed the petition challenging the rejection of an application under Vera Samadhan Yojna, 2019. The court found the respondent's literal interpretation of the Amnesty Scheme inappropriate, particularly given the lack of prior intimation about interest shortfall. The HC quashed the order rejecting the application, directed restoration of the Amnesty Scheme benefits to the petitioner, and ordered refund of Rs. 4,78,833/- recovered from the petitioner's bank account, with 9% per annum interest from the date of recovery until repayment.
HC allowed the petition challenging the rejection of an application under Vera Samadhan Yojna, 2019. The court found the respondent's literal interpretation of the Amnesty Scheme inappropriate, particularly given the lack of prior intimation about interest shortfall. The HC quashed the order rejecting the application, directed restoration of the Amnesty Scheme benefits to the petitioner, and ordered refund of Rs. 4,78,833/- recovered from the petitioner's bank account, with 9% per annum interest from the date of recovery until repayment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
