Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
HC adjudicated a petition regarding illegal seizure of goods, finding that ongoing investigations by GST and Income Tax Departments preclude immediate release. The court directed: (i) Departments must provide notice to Petitioner of proceedings, (ii) Petitioner may seek goods' release through statutory provisions under CGST Act or Income Tax Act, and (iii) Departments shall not dispose of seized goods until investigations and adjudication are completed. The court explicitly noted no examination of case merits and disposed of the petition, enabling Petitioner to pursue administrative remedies for potential goods' release.
HC adjudicated a petition regarding illegal seizure of goods, finding that ongoing investigations by GST and Income Tax Departments preclude immediate release. The court directed: (i) Departments must provide notice to Petitioner of proceedings, (ii) Petitioner may seek goods' release through statutory provisions under CGST Act or Income Tax Act, and (iii) Departments shall not dispose of seized goods until investigations and adjudication are completed. The court explicitly noted no examination of case merits and disposed of the petition, enabling Petitioner to pursue administrative remedies for potential goods' release.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.