Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
HC dismissed the writ petition for lack of maintainability, holding that an alternate statutory remedy exists under the CGST Act, 2017. The court emphasized the rule of exhausting statutory remedies before invoking extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226. The detailed show cause notice served to the petitioner demonstrated procedural compliance, and no exceptional circumstances warranted judicial intervention. The court clarified that alternate remedy is not an absolute bar to writ petition, but in this instance, the petition was deemed non-maintainable without expressing opinions on the substantive merits of the case.
HC dismissed the writ petition for lack of maintainability, holding that an alternate statutory remedy exists under the CGST Act, 2017. The court emphasized the rule of exhausting statutory remedies before invoking extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226. The detailed show cause notice served to the petitioner demonstrated procedural compliance, and no exceptional circumstances warranted judicial intervention. The court clarified that alternate remedy is not an absolute bar to writ petition, but in this instance, the petition was deemed non-maintainable without expressing opinions on the substantive merits of the case.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.