Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC upheld the tax authority's reopening of assessment under Section 148A, finding no jurisdictional error. The notice was issued based on information from a search and seizure operation, alleging the assessee was a beneficiary of transactions by another party. Despite challenges by the assessee referencing prior judicial precedents, the court determined the reopening proceedings were valid. The department's reasons for initiating proceedings were distinct from previous assessments, thereby establishing legitimate grounds for reassessment. The intra-court appeal was dismissed, leaving the assessee to pursue available legal remedies under applicable tax provisions.
The HC upheld the tax authority's reopening of assessment under Section 148A, finding no jurisdictional error. The notice was issued based on information from a search and seizure operation, alleging the assessee was a beneficiary of transactions by another party. Despite challenges by the assessee referencing prior judicial precedents, the court determined the reopening proceedings were valid. The department's reasons for initiating proceedings were distinct from previous assessments, thereby establishing legitimate grounds for reassessment. The intra-court appeal was dismissed, leaving the assessee to pursue available legal remedies under applicable tax provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.