Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC dismissed the commercial appeal, holding that under Section 63 of the IBC, civil courts lack jurisdiction to entertain suits challenging NCLT orders. The appellant's request for interim relief was rejected due to statutory bar on instituting suits related to matters within NCLT's jurisdiction. The court emphasized that statutory remedies remain available through NCLT under Section 21, and recommended the appellant pursue appropriate legal recourse through the designated tribunal. The impugned order refusing ad-interim relief was upheld, with no grounds found for judicial intervention.
HC dismissed the commercial appeal, holding that under Section 63 of the IBC, civil courts lack jurisdiction to entertain suits challenging NCLT orders. The appellant's request for interim relief was rejected due to statutory bar on instituting suits related to matters within NCLT's jurisdiction. The court emphasized that statutory remedies remain available through NCLT under Section 21, and recommended the appellant pursue appropriate legal recourse through the designated tribunal. The impugned order refusing ad-interim relief was upheld, with no grounds found for judicial intervention.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.