Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
HC held that assignment of leasehold rights for industrial land by a lessee to a third party for a lump sum consideration does not constitute a supply under GST provisions. The court determined that Section 7(1)(a) of the GST Act, read with Schedule II, Clause 5(b) and Schedule III, Clause 5, does not attract GST levy for such transactions involving transfer of immovable property rights. Following the precedent set in a prior Gujarat HC decision, the court recognized this as a significant legal issue affecting multiple pending petitions, effectively providing relief to industrial land lessees by exempting such assignments from GST taxation.
HC held that assignment of leasehold rights for industrial land by a lessee to a third party for a lump sum consideration does not constitute a supply under GST provisions. The court determined that Section 7(1)(a) of the GST Act, read with Schedule II, Clause 5(b) and Schedule III, Clause 5, does not attract GST levy for such transactions involving transfer of immovable property rights. Following the precedent set in a prior Gujarat HC decision, the court recognized this as a significant legal issue affecting multiple pending petitions, effectively providing relief to industrial land lessees by exempting such assignments from GST taxation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
