Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
HC allowed the writ petition challenging income tax demand notices. The court held that since tax was already deducted and deposited by the employers (Gauhati HC and Lokayukta), the Income Tax Department cannot raise demands against the petitioner. The non-reflection of TDS in Form 26AS does not negate the actual tax deduction. The department was directed to allow credit of the demanded amount and set aside the demand notices, recognizing the fundamental principle that an assessee cannot be compelled to pay tax already deducted and deposited by their employers.
HC allowed the writ petition challenging income tax demand notices. The court held that since tax was already deducted and deposited by the employers (Gauhati HC and Lokayukta), the Income Tax Department cannot raise demands against the petitioner. The non-reflection of TDS in Form 26AS does not negate the actual tax deduction. The department was directed to allow credit of the demanded amount and set aside the demand notices, recognizing the fundamental principle that an assessee cannot be compelled to pay tax already deducted and deposited by their employers.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
