Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
HC allowed the writ petition challenging income tax demand notices. The court held that since tax was already deducted and deposited by the employers (Gauhati HC and Lokayukta), the Income Tax Department cannot raise demands against the petitioner. The non-reflection of TDS in Form 26AS does not negate the actual tax deduction. The department was directed to allow credit of the demanded amount and set aside the demand notices, recognizing the fundamental principle that an assessee cannot be compelled to pay tax already deducted and deposited by their employers.
HC allowed the writ petition challenging income tax demand notices. The court held that since tax was already deducted and deposited by the employers (Gauhati HC and Lokayukta), the Income Tax Department cannot raise demands against the petitioner. The non-reflection of TDS in Form 26AS does not negate the actual tax deduction. The department was directed to allow credit of the demanded amount and set aside the demand notices, recognizing the fundamental principle that an assessee cannot be compelled to pay tax already deducted and deposited by their employers.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
