Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
HC allowed the writ petition challenging income tax demand notices. The court held that since tax was already deducted and deposited by the employers (Gauhati HC and Lokayukta), the Income Tax Department cannot raise demands against the petitioner. The non-reflection of TDS in Form 26AS does not negate the actual tax deduction. The department was directed to allow credit of the demanded amount and set aside the demand notices, recognizing the fundamental principle that an assessee cannot be compelled to pay tax already deducted and deposited by their employers.
HC allowed the writ petition challenging income tax demand notices. The court held that since tax was already deducted and deposited by the employers (Gauhati HC and Lokayukta), the Income Tax Department cannot raise demands against the petitioner. The non-reflection of TDS in Form 26AS does not negate the actual tax deduction. The department was directed to allow credit of the demanded amount and set aside the demand notices, recognizing the fundamental principle that an assessee cannot be compelled to pay tax already deducted and deposited by their employers.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
