Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The ITAT examined royalty receipts from online chemistry databases and journal subscriptions, determining that the subscription revenues from CAS and PUBS divisions do not constitute taxable royalty under Section 9(1)(vi) and Article 12(3) of the India-USA DTAA. Relying on the assessee's previous case for the assessment year 2014-15, the tribunal upheld the assessee's plea and directed the deletion of the tax addition. The appellate tribunal ultimately allowed the assessee's appeal, ruling that the subscription income was not taxable as royalty in the assessee's hands.
The ITAT examined royalty receipts from online chemistry databases and journal subscriptions, determining that the subscription revenues from CAS and PUBS divisions do not constitute taxable royalty under Section 9(1)(vi) and Article 12(3) of the India-USA DTAA. Relying on the assessee's previous case for the assessment year 2014-15, the tribunal upheld the assessee's plea and directed the deletion of the tax addition. The appellate tribunal ultimately allowed the assessee's appeal, ruling that the subscription income was not taxable as royalty in the assessee's hands.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
