Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT examined royalty receipts from online chemistry databases and journal subscriptions, determining that the subscription revenues from CAS and PUBS divisions do not constitute taxable royalty under Section 9(1)(vi) and Article 12(3) of the India-USA DTAA. Relying on the assessee's previous case for the assessment year 2014-15, the tribunal upheld the assessee's plea and directed the deletion of the tax addition. The appellate tribunal ultimately allowed the assessee's appeal, ruling that the subscription income was not taxable as royalty in the assessee's hands.
The ITAT examined royalty receipts from online chemistry databases and journal subscriptions, determining that the subscription revenues from CAS and PUBS divisions do not constitute taxable royalty under Section 9(1)(vi) and Article 12(3) of the India-USA DTAA. Relying on the assessee's previous case for the assessment year 2014-15, the tribunal upheld the assessee's plea and directed the deletion of the tax addition. The appellate tribunal ultimately allowed the assessee's appeal, ruling that the subscription income was not taxable as royalty in the assessee's hands.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.