Minimum alternate tax exclusions for pre-amendment banking companies and expatriate Indian branch salaries remain outside head office expenditure limi...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1201 to 1220 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT adjudicated a tax assessment reopening dispute, holding the notice under Section 148 invalid. The AO's notice exceeded statutory time limitations, with escaped income (Rs. 32,92,746) falling below the Rs. 50 lakh threshold required for extended reassessment. Furthermore, the approval was improperly granted by the Principal Commissioner, who lacks jurisdictional authority under Section 151(ii). Consequently, the tribunal set aside the reassessment notice, finding procedural violations in both time limitations and approval process. The assessee's appeal was allowed, effectively nullifying the attempted tax reassessment.
ITAT adjudicated a tax assessment reopening dispute, holding the notice under Section 148 invalid. The AO's notice exceeded statutory time limitations, with escaped income (Rs. 32,92,746) falling below the Rs. 50 lakh threshold required for extended reassessment. Furthermore, the approval was improperly granted by the Principal Commissioner, who lacks jurisdictional authority under Section 151(ii). Consequently, the tribunal set aside the reassessment notice, finding procedural violations in both time limitations and approval process. The assessee's appeal was allowed, effectively nullifying the attempted tax reassessment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
