Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
481 to 500 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT adjudicated a tax assessment reopening dispute, holding the notice under Section 148 invalid. The AO's notice exceeded statutory time limitations, with escaped income (Rs. 32,92,746) falling below the Rs. 50 lakh threshold required for extended reassessment. Furthermore, the approval was improperly granted by the Principal Commissioner, who lacks jurisdictional authority under Section 151(ii). Consequently, the tribunal set aside the reassessment notice, finding procedural violations in both time limitations and approval process. The assessee's appeal was allowed, effectively nullifying the attempted tax reassessment.
ITAT adjudicated a tax assessment reopening dispute, holding the notice under Section 148 invalid. The AO's notice exceeded statutory time limitations, with escaped income (Rs. 32,92,746) falling below the Rs. 50 lakh threshold required for extended reassessment. Furthermore, the approval was improperly granted by the Principal Commissioner, who lacks jurisdictional authority under Section 151(ii). Consequently, the tribunal set aside the reassessment notice, finding procedural violations in both time limitations and approval process. The assessee's appeal was allowed, effectively nullifying the attempted tax reassessment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
