Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT adjudicated a tax assessment dispute regarding time-barred order limitations. The tribunal determined that the Assessment Officer's (AO) final assessment order passed on 24.08.2022 was beyond statutory limitation under section 144C(13), referencing Madras HC precedent which emphasized that limitation periods cannot be manipulated through internal procedural variations. The tribunal held that since DRP directions were received on 30.06.2022 at 9:53 p.m., the subsequent assessment order exceeded permissible timelines. Consequently, the tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, declaring the additions in the assessment order void ab initio and directing their deletion.
ITAT adjudicated a tax assessment dispute regarding time-barred order limitations. The tribunal determined that the Assessment Officer's (AO) final assessment order passed on 24.08.2022 was beyond statutory limitation under section 144C(13), referencing Madras HC precedent which emphasized that limitation periods cannot be manipulated through internal procedural variations. The tribunal held that since DRP directions were received on 30.06.2022 at 9:53 p.m., the subsequent assessment order exceeded permissible timelines. Consequently, the tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, declaring the additions in the assessment order void ab initio and directing their deletion.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
