Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
HC analyzed dishonour of cheque case under NI Act, focusing on rebuttal of statutory presumptions. The court held that an accused need not prove defense beyond reasonable doubt but must establish preponderance of probabilities. When challenging a cheque's validity, the accused can use direct or circumstantial evidence to create doubt about legally enforceable debt. The complainant bears the burden of explaining financial capacity when source of funds is questioned. Ultimately, the HC dismissed the appeal, upholding the trial court's acquittal, finding no illegality or impropriety in the original judgment.
HC analyzed dishonour of cheque case under NI Act, focusing on rebuttal of statutory presumptions. The court held that an accused need not prove defense beyond reasonable doubt but must establish preponderance of probabilities. When challenging a cheque's validity, the accused can use direct or circumstantial evidence to create doubt about legally enforceable debt. The complainant bears the burden of explaining financial capacity when source of funds is questioned. Ultimately, the HC dismissed the appeal, upholding the trial court's acquittal, finding no illegality or impropriety in the original judgment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
