Depreciation and routine compliance expenses disallowance did not prove inaccurate particulars or misreporting; penalty sustained only on foreign trav...
HC analyzed dishonour of cheque case under NI Act, focusing on rebuttal of statutory presumptions. The court held that an accused need not prove defense beyond reasonable doubt but must establish preponderance of probabilities. When challenging a cheque's validity, the accused can use direct or circumstantial evidence to create doubt about legally enforceable debt. The complainant bears the burden of explaining financial capacity when source of funds is questioned. Ultimately, the HC dismissed the appeal, upholding the trial court's acquittal, finding no illegality or impropriety in the original judgment.
HC analyzed dishonour of cheque case under NI Act, focusing on rebuttal of statutory presumptions. The court held that an accused need not prove defense beyond reasonable doubt but must establish preponderance of probabilities. When challenging a cheque's validity, the accused can use direct or circumstantial evidence to create doubt about legally enforceable debt. The complainant bears the burden of explaining financial capacity when source of funds is questioned. Ultimately, the HC dismissed the appeal, upholding the trial court's acquittal, finding no illegality or impropriety in the original judgment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
