Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
HC found a violation of natural justice principles in an administrative appeal. The authority dismissed the appeal ex parte on 20.01.2022 without proper notice to the petitioner, despite the last fixed date being 18.01.2022. The order contravened procedural fairness by failing to provide adequate opportunity to be heard and lacking substantive reasoning as mandated under Section 107(12) of CGST Act. Consequently, the HC set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for reconsideration, ensuring procedural compliance and fundamental principles of administrative adjudication.
HC found a violation of natural justice principles in an administrative appeal. The authority dismissed the appeal ex parte on 20.01.2022 without proper notice to the petitioner, despite the last fixed date being 18.01.2022. The order contravened procedural fairness by failing to provide adequate opportunity to be heard and lacking substantive reasoning as mandated under Section 107(12) of CGST Act. Consequently, the HC set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for reconsideration, ensuring procedural compliance and fundamental principles of administrative adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.