Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
HC found a violation of natural justice principles in an administrative appeal. The authority dismissed the appeal ex parte on 20.01.2022 without proper notice to the petitioner, despite the last fixed date being 18.01.2022. The order contravened procedural fairness by failing to provide adequate opportunity to be heard and lacking substantive reasoning as mandated under Section 107(12) of CGST Act. Consequently, the HC set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for reconsideration, ensuring procedural compliance and fundamental principles of administrative adjudication.
HC found a violation of natural justice principles in an administrative appeal. The authority dismissed the appeal ex parte on 20.01.2022 without proper notice to the petitioner, despite the last fixed date being 18.01.2022. The order contravened procedural fairness by failing to provide adequate opportunity to be heard and lacking substantive reasoning as mandated under Section 107(12) of CGST Act. Consequently, the HC set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for reconsideration, ensuring procedural compliance and fundamental principles of administrative adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.