Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
HC dismissed the petition challenging a GST order, holding that the petitioner must first exhaust the statutory remedy of appeal under Section 107 of the GST Act. The court found no exceptional circumstances warranting direct judicial review, emphasizing the need to follow prescribed administrative appellate mechanisms. The petitioner was directed to file an appeal within four weeks, with the appellate authority considering the time spent in HC as valid for potential delay condonation. The petition was disposed of without examining the substantive merits of the original tax dispute.
HC dismissed the petition challenging a GST order, holding that the petitioner must first exhaust the statutory remedy of appeal under Section 107 of the GST Act. The court found no exceptional circumstances warranting direct judicial review, emphasizing the need to follow prescribed administrative appellate mechanisms. The petitioner was directed to file an appeal within four weeks, with the appellate authority considering the time spent in HC as valid for potential delay condonation. The petition was disposed of without examining the substantive merits of the original tax dispute.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
