Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC dismissed the refund claim, holding that no writ of mandamus could be issued to process the petitioner's refund application for AY 2020-21. The court acknowledged the respondents' communications indicating the refund was withheld due to CASS scrutiny criteria for AY 2023-24. While the court agreed that communications should have been served earlier to the petitioner, it ultimately found no further substantive grounds to challenge the decision, effectively leaving the refund claim unresolved and permitting the respondents to continue their scrutiny process.
HC dismissed the refund claim, holding that no writ of mandamus could be issued to process the petitioner's refund application for AY 2020-21. The court acknowledged the respondents' communications indicating the refund was withheld due to CASS scrutiny criteria for AY 2023-24. While the court agreed that communications should have been served earlier to the petitioner, it ultimately found no further substantive grounds to challenge the decision, effectively leaving the refund claim unresolved and permitting the respondents to continue their scrutiny process.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.