Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was not sustainable where the assessee voluntarily disclosed correct income and paid due tax before receiving notice u/s 148. The tribunal found that tax and interest were deposited on 27-05-2019, predating the notice issued on 03-03-2020. The assessee's arguments were accepted, emphasizing that the income tax payment was made prior to the statutory notice, rendering the penalty inappropriate. Consequently, the grounds of appeal were allowed, effectively quashing the penalty proceedings against the taxpayer.
ITAT held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was not sustainable where the assessee voluntarily disclosed correct income and paid due tax before receiving notice u/s 148. The tribunal found that tax and interest were deposited on 27-05-2019, predating the notice issued on 03-03-2020. The assessee's arguments were accepted, emphasizing that the income tax payment was made prior to the statutory notice, rendering the penalty inappropriate. Consequently, the grounds of appeal were allowed, effectively quashing the penalty proceedings against the taxpayer.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.