Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
ITAT dismissed revenue's appeal, affirming lower appellate authority's finding that JCIT (Exemptions), Ghaziabad improperly assumed jurisdictional authority. The tribunal noted no evidence of valid order under Section 127 transferring case jurisdiction from DCIT (Exemptions). Consequently, notices issued under Sections 142(1) and 143(2) were deemed invalid. The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, finding no procedural irregularities warranting interference, thereby effectively cancelling the jurisdictionally defective assessment proceedings.
ITAT dismissed revenue's appeal, affirming lower appellate authority's finding that JCIT (Exemptions), Ghaziabad improperly assumed jurisdictional authority. The tribunal noted no evidence of valid order under Section 127 transferring case jurisdiction from DCIT (Exemptions). Consequently, notices issued under Sections 142(1) and 143(2) were deemed invalid. The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, finding no procedural irregularities warranting interference, thereby effectively cancelling the jurisdictionally defective assessment proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.