Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
ITAT dismissed revenue's appeal, affirming lower appellate authority's finding that JCIT (Exemptions), Ghaziabad improperly assumed jurisdictional authority. The tribunal noted no evidence of valid order under Section 127 transferring case jurisdiction from DCIT (Exemptions). Consequently, notices issued under Sections 142(1) and 143(2) were deemed invalid. The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, finding no procedural irregularities warranting interference, thereby effectively cancelling the jurisdictionally defective assessment proceedings.
ITAT dismissed revenue's appeal, affirming lower appellate authority's finding that JCIT (Exemptions), Ghaziabad improperly assumed jurisdictional authority. The tribunal noted no evidence of valid order under Section 127 transferring case jurisdiction from DCIT (Exemptions). Consequently, notices issued under Sections 142(1) and 143(2) were deemed invalid. The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, finding no procedural irregularities warranting interference, thereby effectively cancelling the jurisdictionally defective assessment proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.