Equivalent value attachment under money laundering law upheld where received funds were treated as proceeds of crime and prior-acquired property could...
ITAT dismissed revenue's appeal, affirming lower appellate authority's finding that JCIT (Exemptions), Ghaziabad improperly assumed jurisdictional authority. The tribunal noted no evidence of valid order under Section 127 transferring case jurisdiction from DCIT (Exemptions). Consequently, notices issued under Sections 142(1) and 143(2) were deemed invalid. The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, finding no procedural irregularities warranting interference, thereby effectively cancelling the jurisdictionally defective assessment proceedings.
ITAT dismissed revenue's appeal, affirming lower appellate authority's finding that JCIT (Exemptions), Ghaziabad improperly assumed jurisdictional authority. The tribunal noted no evidence of valid order under Section 127 transferring case jurisdiction from DCIT (Exemptions). Consequently, notices issued under Sections 142(1) and 143(2) were deemed invalid. The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, finding no procedural irregularities warranting interference, thereby effectively cancelling the jurisdictionally defective assessment proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
