Foreign portfolio investment liberalisation extends listed equity access to all individual persons resident outside India, subject to limit monitoring...
ITAT dismissed revenue's appeal, affirming lower appellate authority's finding that JCIT (Exemptions), Ghaziabad improperly assumed jurisdictional authority. The tribunal noted no evidence of valid order under Section 127 transferring case jurisdiction from DCIT (Exemptions). Consequently, notices issued under Sections 142(1) and 143(2) were deemed invalid. The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, finding no procedural irregularities warranting interference, thereby effectively cancelling the jurisdictionally defective assessment proceedings.
ITAT dismissed revenue's appeal, affirming lower appellate authority's finding that JCIT (Exemptions), Ghaziabad improperly assumed jurisdictional authority. The tribunal noted no evidence of valid order under Section 127 transferring case jurisdiction from DCIT (Exemptions). Consequently, notices issued under Sections 142(1) and 143(2) were deemed invalid. The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, finding no procedural irregularities warranting interference, thereby effectively cancelling the jurisdictionally defective assessment proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.