Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
ITAT held that reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond 3 years is impermissible when tax evasion does not exceed Rs. 50,00,000. Relying on precedents from Delhi HC and Bombay HC, the tribunal quashed the reassessment notice u/s 148A(d) and 148, finding the proceedings invalid. The AO's best judgment assessment, which added unexplained investment and stamp duty value differences, was set aside. The assessee's appeal was allowed, rendering subsequent grounds academic, effectively nullifying the extended assessment proceedings.
ITAT held that reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond 3 years is impermissible when tax evasion does not exceed Rs. 50,00,000. Relying on precedents from Delhi HC and Bombay HC, the tribunal quashed the reassessment notice u/s 148A(d) and 148, finding the proceedings invalid. The AO's best judgment assessment, which added unexplained investment and stamp duty value differences, was set aside. The assessee's appeal was allowed, rendering subsequent grounds academic, effectively nullifying the extended assessment proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
