Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
ITAT held that reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond 3 years is impermissible when tax evasion does not exceed Rs. 50,00,000. Relying on precedents from Delhi HC and Bombay HC, the tribunal quashed the reassessment notice u/s 148A(d) and 148, finding the proceedings invalid. The AO's best judgment assessment, which added unexplained investment and stamp duty value differences, was set aside. The assessee's appeal was allowed, rendering subsequent grounds academic, effectively nullifying the extended assessment proceedings.
ITAT held that reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond 3 years is impermissible when tax evasion does not exceed Rs. 50,00,000. Relying on precedents from Delhi HC and Bombay HC, the tribunal quashed the reassessment notice u/s 148A(d) and 148, finding the proceedings invalid. The AO's best judgment assessment, which added unexplained investment and stamp duty value differences, was set aside. The assessee's appeal was allowed, rendering subsequent grounds academic, effectively nullifying the extended assessment proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
